A review process designed to be understood.

From research to recommendation

1. 1
   Define the audience

   We identify who the service is designed for and the problem it claims to solve.

2. 2
   Inspect primary sources

   Official plan, lineup, app-store, terms, privacy, support, and compatibility pages come first.

3. 3
   Compare practical fit

   We evaluate trade-offs against comparable services and common household needs without treating catalog claims as proof of content rights.

4. 4
   Score using fixed weights

   Every service uses the same category weights. The written verdict explains where nuance matters.

5. 5
   Fact-check and publish

   Claims, links, dates, and disclosures are reviewed before publication.

What the score measures

Scores are editorial assessments on a 10-point scale. They summarize fit and quality under our framework; they are not guarantees of future uptime or universal satisfaction.

Sources and verification

We prioritize primary sources: official provider websites, published terms, recognized app stores, device compatibility documentation, and rights-holder announcements. Secondary reporting provides context but does not replace current plan terms.

Affiliate relationships and corrections

We may receive compensation when readers visit or subscribe through selected links. Providers cannot buy a score, edit a verdict, or suppress a material limitation. Commercial links are marked for search engines with the appropriate relationship attributes.

• Writers do not receive commission-based scoring incentives.
• Material factual errors are corrected in the article.
• Significant updates change the displayed review date.
• Readers and providers can submit evidence for review.